However, Bishop Fellay is not asking for this. What is there to want from Rome? The condemnation of all Vatican II documents and the condemnation of the New Mass. "Rome is giving us all we need for reconciliation.
One would think that Fellay is cooperating with the Romans to make it look like Rome is no longer the enemy of tradition. #3: He has accepted permission to hear confessions and grant marriages. #2: He has gladly accepted the lifting of the excommunications of the four SSPX bishops. #1: Fellay has joyfully accepted the freeing of the Latin Mass.
We have been getting a steady stream of deceptions as follows: In remote locations, because they were opposed to an agreement.īy 2018, we have been watching the new direction of the SSPX for six years. Later in 2012, Bishop Fellay expelled Bishop Willianson,īecause Williamson was speaking out against an agreement with Rome.ĭuring the next six years, we watched Fellay expell many priests who were speaking out against merging with Rome. Rome is trying to de-Christianize civilization." "Even if Rome gives us everything we want, Now it was obvious that Fellay was trying to take the SSPX in the opposite direction of Archbishop Lefebvre, who said in 1987,
#Sspx schismatic code
The Doctrinal Declaration accepted (1) Vatican II, (2) the New Mass, (3) the 1983 Code of Canon Law. This saved the SSPX from committing suicide, because Perhaps Rome wants the whole SSPX under its authority, not just part of the SSPX. Rome refused to sign it, probably because the three other SSPX bishops were opposed to an agreement with Rome. A Doctrinal Declaration was presented to Rome by the SSPX superior general, Bishop Fellay, for the purpose In 1996, GREC was formed to find a way to integrate the SSPX into Rome, primarily by avoiding the discussion of Church Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary.Īfter the death of Lefebvre, in 1991, things started to change in the SSPX headquarters. Has shown a strong desire to merge with Rome for many years and has expelled many priest for publicly criticizing a merger. Recently, a new traditional group has been founded in Avrille, France, to preserve the Faith, precisely because the past SSPX leader (Fellay) In February 1991, Lefebvre said what separated SSPX from Rome. Disobedience alone does not place a person in schism.įor many years, the SSPX had been the only traditional group, which did not require its priests to accept Vatican II, the New Mass The SSPX is not in schism, because it accepts the Roman papacy. Or read one of the two books written by Archbishop Lefebvre: Rome has left the Church."įor a good explanation about what is wrong with Vatican II, listen to what If one culpably thought there was a necessity, he would still incur no automatic penalties (canon 1324, §3 §1, 80).ĭid Lefebvre think there was a state of necessity? Yes, because he said:.If one inculpably thought there was a necessity, he would not incur the penalty (canon 1323, 70).A person who violates a law out of necessity is not subject to a penalty (1983 Code of Canon Law, canon 1323, §4), even if there is no state of necessity.However, the excommunication for abuse of episcopal powers (canon 1382) was not incurred because: Rome was angry about this and claimed that Lefebvre incurred the "grave penalty of excommunication" in Pope Lefebvre did this without the approval of Rome. Refusing to provide the SSPX with any bishops. In 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops for the preservation of the SSPX, precisely because Rome was The SSPX steadily grew to become a worldwide organization operating in many countries. The SSPX is a missionary society and operates independently from the local bishops using supplied Obviously, the SSPX was dedicated to the preservation of the traditionalĬatholic Faith. The SSPX with the approval of the local bishop. Seminaries were teaching a new religion, the religion of Vatican II, which is not Catholic. * The New Society Of Saint Pius X (SSPX) DRBO.ORG Summa-Theologiae.ORGĪbout 1970, seminarians approached Archbishop Lefebvre and said they needed a new seminary because the Roman
0 kommentar(er)
